Development for Employability Discussion Writing Homework Help

Development for Employability Discussion Writing Homework Help

 
Marking Rubric for BSP030 Individual Written Assessment: SWOT, STAR (and CV) < 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 > 80 SWOT Analysis – general (weighting 15) No effort has been made to use the SWOT analysis, each of the sections lack any detail. No context provided to the analysis. No attention to spelling or grammar. A very limited effort has been made to use the SWOT analysis. Equal consideration was not given to all sections in the SWOT, with considerably more details included in some sections and lacking in others. No attempt to provide context to the analysis. Large number of errors made regarding spelling and grammar, attention to detail needed. A limited effort has been made to use the SWOT analysis. Equal consideration was not given to SWOT sections leading to an imbalance of information. Little, or no, attempt to provide context. Number of errors made regarding spelling and grammar, attention to detail needed. The SWOT analysis was used to some effect to analysis employability, but overall, it was lacking in evidence. Some sections have more details than others and therefore there was an imbalance of information. Limited attempt to put the SWOT analysis in context i.e. introduction and conclusion. Errors made regarding spelling and grammar, attention to detail needed. A good use of SWOT to analyse employability which included evidence. For much of the time there was equal consideration to each section. There was an attempt to provide context with an introduction and/or conclusion but these were not detailed. Accurate spelling and grammar with some mistakes. A very good use of SWOT to analyse employability, which included a good level of detailed evidence. Each section was considered equally. Introduction and conclusions included to provide context; however, these were brief. Accurate spelling and grammar with minimal mistakes. SWOT Analysis – content (weighting 25) No analysis or evidence provided, with no understanding of the difference between internal and external impacts on employability. Very limited details provided in the SWOT analysis. Limited understanding of the difference between internal and external impacts. Brief list of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats provided, but the information is limited. No analysis undertaken and few details provided regarding employability. There is some overlap in the information provided for the internal and external impacts. List of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats provided, with evidence and analysis limited. There is some understanding of the internal and external impacts however there are some overlaps. Some understanding is demonstrated regarding the internal and external factors that will have an impact on employability, however it is limited in relation to the explanations and analysis provided. Very good understanding is demonstrated regarding the internal and external factors that will have an impact on employability with some relevant points made within each section, providing good analysis. An excellent use of SWOT to analyse employability, with the use of extensive and significant evidence. There was an equal consideration to all sections and a good balance of information provided. The analysis has been put into context with an introduction such as a statement of a career goal or future objective on which the SWOT is based. A conclusion was included to either summarise goals or plan for what is needed next. Accurate spelling and grammar. Extensive understanding is demonstrated regarding the internal and external factors that will have an impact on employability. Relevant points are made within each section, providing clear and relevant explanations and analysis. For example, strengths detailing how the individual demonstrates they are good employment prospect, how they will overcome their weaknesses, how opportunities can be best used and how any threats can be mitigated. STAR Plus Portfolio – general (weighting 15) No effort has been made to discuss 6 employability skills, with poor examples provided that lacked any detail to demonstrate how the skills were used/acquired. No attention to spelling or grammar. STAR Plus Portfolio – use of framework and content (weighting 45) No effort made to use the STAR Plus framework. Very limited information included, no insight provided into how the skill was demonstrated. Very limited effort to discuss employability skills and the level of detail included was lacking and did not demonstrate the skill in question well. There was either some repetition of the employability skills used and/or the examples used did not clearly demonstrate the skill in question. Large number of errors made regarding spelling and grammar, attention to detail needed. Very limited effort to use the STAR plus framework, with little information in the examples. Misunderstanding of what information to include in each of the sections of STAR Plus e.g. Reflection and Application are missing or have limited information. There has been a limited effort to discuss employability skills and the level of information included was not sufficient to successfully demonstrate the skill in question. Number of errors made regarding spelling and grammar, attention to detail needed. 6 different employability skills have been discussed however the details included in each of the examples were limited at times and therefore did not demonstrate the skills as clearly as it should have done. Errors made regarding spelling and grammar, attention to detail needed. 6 different employability skills used, with good examples provided. Some good information provided to help demonstrate the skill. Accurate spelling and grammar with some mistakes. 6 different employability skills have been used, with very good examples provided. These have been discussed well, with relevant information that demonstrate the skill in each example. Accurate spelling and grammar with minimal mistakes. 6 different employability skills have been used, with excellent examples provided. Each example includes significant and relevant information that specifically and clearly demonstrates the skill in question in each example. Accurate spelling and grammar. Limited use the STAR Plus framework, but the sections were lacking in information, e.g. more could have be included in the Action section to ensure how the skill was demonstrated is clear. Some misunderstanding of what information to include in each of the sections of STAR Plus. STAR Plus framework was used however the level and clarity of the information was not consistent and more information could have been provided to demonstrate how the skill was demonstrated e.g. some reflection carried out; however this was brief. A good use of the STAR Plu